Mr. Beta

June 9, 2011

I’m on record as not liking the traditional alpha male much. To me, these are the guys in eighties romances who hate all women except for the heroine, and she has to prove herself worthy. But now we’re hearing about beta males, and you’d think I’d really like them. But no. I must confess, they don’t do it for me either.

Kurt Wallander
Wallander

I say this after having watched one and a half seasons of Wallander, probably the ultimate beta male show. Wallander is based on several best-selling mysteries written by the Swedish novelist Henning Mankell about a Swedish cop named Kurt Wallander. Possibly because of his nationality, Wallander suffers from a terminal case of angst. He’s continually being reminded of the nastiness of mankind, particularly wealthy Swedish mankind. But what really got to me was Wallander’s breakdown, which came early in the second season. He was pursuing a nasty neo-Nazi who had burned down a migrant worker camp along with shotgunning an innocent immigrant. When Kurt finally caught up with him, the neo-Nazi started to turn the shotgun on him. So Kurt shot him. Fatally.

In any other cop show, that would probably be it. Clearly self-defense. Clearly somebody whose death isn’t exactly a loss to society. But not Wallander. Kurt goes into a tailspin. He turns in his badge and disappears for six months. When he returns, he’s a broken man.

Now you’d think, given my dislike of alphas, that I’d be one of Kurt Wallander’s biggest fans. I mean, here’s a cop who’s so sensitive that killing somebody, even a neo-Nazi who’s trying to kill him, throws him into a clinical depression. If that ain’t beta, I don’t know what is. But perversely enough, that episode was enough to convince me I didn’t want to see any more of the series.

There’s a thin line between sensitive and dopey, you see. I’m not in favor of a return to the Stallone/Swarzenegger tradition of gunning somebody down and tossing out a quip, but I’m also not in favor of going overboard in the opposite direction.

rylan givens
Rylan

I found myself wanting to introduce Kurt Wallander to Rylan Givens, Elmore Leonard’s quirky hero in Justified. Except that I’m fairly certain Kurt and Rylan would have nothing to say to each other, not speaking one another’s language in more ways than one. Rylan, you see, works in a very different environment, surrounded by hardscrabble poverty and murderous meth dealers. He doesn’t have the luxury of Kurt’s moral qualms, although he does run into (and arrest) the occasional wealthy scoundrel in the course of the show. He doesn’t kill people for fun, but he doesn’t hesitate to protect himself or those around him.

By Wallander’s standards, Rylan is impossibly quick on the draw, but I’d argue that Rylan’s actions are never unjustified (hence the title of the show). And Rylan himself is never less than serious about what he does.

And that’s maybe the difference between the eighties alphas I find annoying and the contemporary alphas I like. Because I like Rylan a lot for one major reason: he knows his stuff and he’s not a jerk. Eighties alphas were jerks; contemporary betas like Kurt Wallander are frequently ridiculous. But Rylan? To me, Rylan’s just right!



Posted in Blog • Tags: , , , , , |  8 Comments

 

8 thoughts on “Mr. Beta

  1. I have to argue with this one in that I don’t believe Beta = weak. It sounds to me (having not watched or heard of this show) that Wallander is a weak character. Weak and possibly disturbed in some way, be it from something in his past or what have you. I realize he is not an Alpha and I don’t know what he would be, but I would not say he’s a Beta.

    I personally love the Beta hero, though in most discussions my image of the Beta hero turns into what has become known as the Gamma hero, which (in my terminology) is a Beta hero with Alpha moments.

    For me, your character Cal is a Beta hero. This may not be the text book definition of a Beta, but for me, Cal is the perfect example.

  2. I’d agree that Cal isn’t an alpha, and I’ve used the “gamma” idea myself. In fact, gamma would be my choice (and Rylan Givens might well qualify). I really hate the eighties alpha (think Stallone and Swarzenegger) because he’s such a jerk, and whenever I run into a hero like that in today’s romance fiction I run in the other direction. But I’m afraid the “beta” idea has sort of sunk into another cliche, where “sensitive” becomes “annoying.”

  3. Totally agree on the 80s Alpha. Though oddly enough I read Romance throughout the 80s and didn’t think to question those bossy, arrogant jerks. My friend Janga often points out that today, Alpha seems to have taken on the “jerk” or “overbearing” male traits, but it’s more about being a natural leader. It’s an air and quality a man (or woman) has, not a demand they make on others or an insistence on being right all the time.

    Unfortunately, the “pushy jerk” idea is much too prevalent for my tastes.

  4. You know I love my Raylan–I’m actually watching an episode of Justified right now and currently reading Pronto, an Elmore Leonard novel that features him. And I like alphas–Dean from Supernatural, mcSteamy from Grey’s, though I can see your jerk argument.

    As far as betas, I see characters like Jim from The Office and Wash from Firefly. They aren’t weak, they’re good at what they do, but they aren’t/don’t want to be leaders.

    I definitely don’t care to see Wallander though!

  5. I dunno–I’m still not delighted with alphas, but I think my definition is more limited than yours b/c Dean strikes me as a gamma (or he did the last time I watched, which was a couple of years ago). So does Michael on Burn Notice and Nathan on Leverage, as well as Danny Ocean in all the Ocean’s Eleven films. Alphas, to me, are the guys with more muscles and testosterone than charm. Gammas, on the other hand, have a sense of humor, a heart, and the ability to protect their lady friends from harm. And Rylan definitely falls into that category.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *